`10 things to remember if you want to satisfy a DMOZ editor`

10 things satisfy DMOZ editor

10 things to remember if you want to satisfy a Dmoz editor – this was not my original blog title , but i decided to change this as i continued writing and noticed , this is what i want and also what many others might want to know.

  1. I visit many a webmaster forum and even though I am a web developer myself, it often pains me to see quite a few webmasters constantly cribbing about how ODP editors do not wish to hear their requests, DMOZ does not give attention to its customers and Dmoz is no longer valuable. Such posts does not do you much good ( i for sure do not enjoy seeing it, nor does it make help your cause.) Your time is more valuable than ranting about it.
  2. I would have liked to write ” don’t be the problem, be the solution” . But i know the smartass answer to that . That being, ‘DMOZ meta editors are a secretive and scheming bastards and they do not approve XYZ’s application, so if my attempt at being a solution is blocked, i would rather be a problem‘.
    Wrong again – DMOZ meta editors who have the extremely difficult task of handling multiple responsibilities, along with checking your submitted applications are bound by even more difficult set of protocols and norms to maintain while review yours. Make sure you comply with all the requested tasks in the application form. if you have complied with it , you have already done your bit. Do not dilute that good deed.
  3. During my not so illustrious career as DMOZ editor, my first few days was filled up by studying the guidelines , which drives my editing operations every day. As an editor I am supposed to find and select links, websites and resources to fill up my category. A librarian’s bookmarks, a link list created by an obsessive surfer cum webmaster of a particular genre / interest, were the origin of web directories . As an editor, I will take more time in locating such over user submitted websites . Deal with it . And even better – become the resource I have a probability to find. :)
  4. The next part of the guidelines also explained how to write titles for a website. When you create a website, you already have a true name for it – it is helpful if you keep that in mind while submitting . If you are Bill’s Plumbing, i will name you as Bill’s Plumbing only and not Plumbing, Pipes, Cheapest plumber, Best Customer Support etc etc. Sounds good ?
  5. Coming to descriptions – I know what would irritate me . If i see an Ad on the local yellow pages of a carpenter , and visited his shop only to see that he currently only sells hammers and nails . Or again, How would you really feel if you decided to order a 5 tier birthday cake and went to the bakery, only to see it is a single guy standing outside a shop with a basket with a few muffins ? I am hoping you understand what I am getting at here .
  6. Describing a site, I feel requires knowing it’s content , and also gaining some knowledge about the owner / organization of the site and his/ her intent. If you have ever purchased an SSL Certificate before , you will understand this scenario – just like the certifying authority ( such as GoDaddy , Verisign etc ;) ) , I am certifying , in a way , that your site is what I am saying it is . So please , make it obvious on your website what you really do and even better – have examples of what you have done / can do, and identify yourself / your organization .
  7. You have made a product , or you are offering a service – very few times there would be someone better than you who can best categorize you or your website . So make sure when your submit your url, do it in the exactly right category. It could so be that where you have submitted may not have a exact category editor , and it may be reviewed by someone with relatively less knowledge on the topic . If that happens, your submission may cause the passing reviewer more trouble in choosing the right category for you, and if it does not get sent to the proper category , it may remain in the loop – thus extending the delay of your approval.
  8. Do not submit your site in the DMOZ if all you need is a link from a PRX page . There are hundreds of other ways to get that . Inside the directory , if you are submitting for the first time and if you have a physical business, it is of utmost importance that you submit it first in your local regional category, even if that means submitting to a page with Zero Pagerank . There is a high probability that such a low level category might have lesser submission reviewing workload for the editor. It might also quite possibly happen that the editor who is reviewing your site may already know of your business.
  9. Do not offer bribes , donations, congratulations letters masked as submission status requests, endorsements of any kinds. If you really want to do good , save the world from corrupt dmoz editors, there is a button for that . ( Push the button ) :p
  10. Do not create duplicate , triplicate clone websites just for submission to the ODP . I can not possibly recommend business strategies for you , so you can easily have multiple websites for gaming, seo , traffic , profit and all important reason, but do not make it your intent to submit all of them to us – we can by rule only accept and review any one of them.

The above list is not exhaustive, neither endorsed in any way by DMOZ , Netscape, and any one else but me in my personal capacity as a adviser of you – my web visitor . :) . I do not take responsibility of any good as well as bad effects which may or may not occur to you and your website in its endeavor in getting listed in the ODP. However , if you do get a kick out of it , and also benefit from these points, feel free to share this article to your friend and social circle . :)

Wishing you all the best .

Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Sunday, June 29th, 2008 at 10:41 pm and is filed under DMOZ. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. Do Follow blog with a comment Policy.

12 Responses to “10 things satisfy DMOZ editor”

  1. Dan Waldron Says:

    I must say this is a great article i enjoyed reading it keep the good work :)

  2. makrhod Says:

    Excellent post! (It came up on my Google alert for blogs about ODP/DMOZ, otherwise I would not have found it.) You are certainly doing as much as you can to help educate people about the way the ODP works, and you should be congratulated for that. Sadly it doesn’t seem to matter how many explanations are given, whether in the public guidelines, in blogs or in forums like RZ and DP. Many webmasters still prefer to ignore it all and keep on complaining that the ODP is not what *they* want it to be. But even if one person learns something each time we try, it is worth while. :-)
    BTW I’ve just read your other DMOZ posts – should I check my mail archives to see if I ever started one with “This is an unsolicited feedback …”? ;-D

  3. arindra Says:

    lol Mak, that was another helpful person , not you ;)
    however i did post this in link in a forum you probably don’t have access to currently .

  4. Jayne Roceo Says:

    Your post on gs to remember if you want to satisfy a DMOZ editor really added to that, and I found myself nodding throughout your post!

  5. Yossarian Says:

    Personally I don’t find DMOZ worth it. I will submit a site but I am not going to cry if I don’t get in. I’d sooner spend my time on developing decent content and finding easier / better links elsewhere.

  6. arindra Says:

    A perfectly sane idea Yossarian ,
    however to note , this post or any similar is not exactly an endorsement or advert to get more people to submit to DMOZ , as already explained above .
    It is only meant for those , who plan to submit … it is a guide of what to do and what not to do .

  7. Let Me Count The Ways: Enumerated Sphinn Wisdom | Search Engine People Blog Says:

    [...] 10 things to remember if you want to satisfy a DMOZ editor [...]

  8. Amrit Ray Says:

    Your post is good, but it is just repetition of what the DMOZ guidelines already suggest. It is very easy to write about it because you want to write an article. But the fact is that even if you have a very good informative website and you follow all the guidelines there is a very slim chance that the editor will recognize your site as worthy and list it in the directory. There are just too many submissions and I don’t blame them they are unable to cope with it.

  9. arindra Says:

    Hi Amit ,
    If you read the post and the DMOZ guidelines, you would know that webmaster submissions are only one of the places we get sites to enlist website on the ODP . The categories where I edit does not have tremendous amount of submissions, but unique information is one of the factors I personally do take notice off , while adding sites.

  10. Pager Call Systems Says:

    It must be a nightmare being a DMOZ editor, some catergories are swamped and others have few submissions and others have no editor so they are waiting for one of the more senior editors to drop by an clear some of the backlog.

    Considering they are volunteers it seems a bit of a thankless task. The objective of being a quality web directory is a tough one to get right.

  11. sandrar Says:

    Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog. :) Cheers! Sandra. R.

  12. Charles Says:

    imho it would be helpful if all or part of the submission part of the dmoz site were automated. shouldn’t be too hard to pull info off the site. You plug in your site. A tool grabs info off your site and fills in the form. judging by google’s webmaster tools there should be the ability to detect a website that gaming the system.

    once all the forms are filled in, a human editor can come by and decide whether the site is worth adding to the system. Another tool could be used to make this process simple. The tool would be one that checked the new entry for variation against others in the same category.

    With this kind of automation the pain of submission and review could be much reduced.

Leave a Reply